IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 01 Apr 2008 Members (asterisk for those attending): Ambrish Varma, Cadence Design Systems * Arpad Muranyi, Mentor Graphics Corp. * Barry Katz, SiSoft * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group * Brad Griffin, Cadence Design Systems David Banas, Xilinx Donald Telian, consultant Doug White, Cisco Systems Essaid Bensoudane, ST Microelectronics Ganesh Narayanaswamy, ST Micro G*** Guan, Sigrity Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems Ian Dodd Joe Abler, IBM * John Angulo, Mentor Graphics John Shields, Mentor Graphics Ken Willis, Cadence Design Systems Kumar, Cadence Design Systems Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems Luis Boluna, Cisco Michael Mirmak, Intel Corp. * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Steinberger, SiSoft * Mustansir Fanaswalla, Xilinx Patrick O'Halloran, Tiburon Design Automation Paul Fernando, NCSU * Radek Biernacki, Agilent (EESof) Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Ray Comeau, Cadence Design Systems Richard Mellitz, Intel Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Sam Chitwood, Sigrity Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Shangli Wu, Cadence * Sid Singh, Extreme Networks Stephen Scearce, Cisco Systems Steve Pytel, Ansoft Syed Huq, Cisco Systems Syed Sadeghi, ST Micro * Terry Jernberg, Cadence Design Systems * Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Vikas Gupta, Xilinx Vuk Borich, Agilent * Walter Katz, SiSoft -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. ----- Opens: None. ------------- Review of ARs: - David Banas report Xilinx position on LTI assumption for SerDes - No update - Arpad: Write parameter passing syntax proposal (BIRD draft) for *-AMS models in IBIS that is consistent with the parameter passing syntax of the AMI models - TBD - TBD: Propose a parameter passing syntax for the SPICE - [External ...] also? - TBD - Arpad: Review the documentation (annotation) in the macro libraries. - Deferred until a demand arises or we have nothing else to do ------------- New Discussion: Todd shared a presentation "IBIS-ATM BIRD Update": - This describes an ambiguity problem in the AMI BIRD. - SiSoft & Cadence AMI results were correlated to HSPICE. - SiSoft & Cadence differed on perception of the inputs to GetWave(). - Running the SiSoft model in the Cadence tester would double-count Hcr & Htei. - An experiment with a modified SiSoft model proves a good match. - Proposal: New AMI Use_Init_Output param to specify which way it works. - Mike: Will model makers understand which way to go? - Todd: (insert long answer here). - Bob: We should get this into BIRD form right away. - The analysis at the bottom of the BIRD need not change. - This needs a new BIRD number since the AMI BIRD has already passed. - The new BIRD can be introduced at IBIS Open Forum this Friday. AR: Cadence and SiSoft BIRDify the Use_Init_Output param proposal Walter shared his proposed EMD Solution presentation: - Walter, Bob and Michael M. met with IEEE PIC group - IEEE want signal integrity models for backplanes - IEEE suggested adding XYZ coords to [mPins] - Walter added Part_Number to [Components] - This may be a corporate P/N, not necessarily vendor P/N - John: Can an ICM be called in addition to IBIS? - Walter: Yes, but the details of that would have to be worked out - ICM could be a SPICE "meta object" AR: Todd send presentation to Mike L. AR: Mike L: post Todd's IBIS-ATM BIRD Update presentation to web Next meeting: 8 April 2007 12:00pm PT -----------